|Table of Contents|

Expert’s Credibility Model and Evaluation Method

《南京理工大学学报》(自然科学版)[ISSN:1005-9830/CN:32-1397/N]

Issue:
2010年01期
Page:
30-34
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Expert’s Credibility Model and Evaluation Method
Author(s):
XU lin-sheng12WANG Zhi-quan1DAI Yue-wei1
1.School of Automation,NUST,Nanjing 210094,China;2.63961th Troup,General Armament Department of PLA,Beijing 100000,China
Keywords:
multi-attributive evaluation appraising experts credibility
PACS:
N945.16
DOI:
-
Abstract:
To correctly appraise whether the multi-attributive evaluation by appraising experts is credible,this paper presents the evaluation criteria of expert’s credibility in multi-attributive appraising activities.Three kinds of modeling methods for individual expert’s credibility are studied.The ordering and classification methods of the the expert’s evaluation levels are established.The application examples show that this research results can help to select and regulate the appraising experts in the appraising management.

References:

[ 1] 吴敬业, 汤理. 评价专家的可靠性预分析[ J]. 系统 工程, 1992, 10( 5) : 52- 59.
[ 2] 李荣钧. 模糊多准则决策理论与应用[M ] . 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[ 3] Chang Tsung-han , W ang Tien-ch in. U sing the fuzzy mult-i criteria dec ision m aking approach for m easuring the possibility of successful know ledge management[ J]. Information Sciences, 2009, 179: 355- 370.
[ 4] 刘云, 林华明. 国防科技项目评审专家反估指标及 算法[ J]. 国防科技基础, 2008( 6): 3- 6.
[ 5] 万猛. 关于科技评审专家的选择及其评审行为的 判断方法[ J]. 研究与发展管理, 2007( 3): 23- 25.
[ 6] 刘爱玲, 王平, 宋子良. 科技奖励中评审结果的可信 度研究[ J]. 中国科技奖励, 1997, 16( 2): 88- 93.
[ 7] 陆垂伟. 一个随机选取评委系统的设计与实现[ J]. 计算机应用与软件, 2005, 22( 6): 61- 62.
[ 8] 张春晖. 高校科技项目评审的公正性问题探讨[ J]. 湖北经济学院学报, 2007, 4( 2): 182- 184.
[ 9] 李莹, 李燕萍. 我国评估评审专家评价体系的构建问 题研究[ J]. 科技进步与对策, 2005, 22( 1): 42- 45.
[ 10] 郑称德. 同行评议专家工作业绩测评及其指标初 探[ J] . 科技管理研究, 2002, 22( 4): 10- 13.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2012-11-02